How the number is built. Four grades for balance sheet, profitability, cash flow and growth, each from 0 to 5. More points is better, 20 is the maximum. The four grades are weighted equally and added; there is no weighting key and no markdown from the weakest grade. If a grade is missing because data is missing, it is not estimated: the total is then withheld and the page names what is missing. The share valuation does not enter the sum; it sits alongside as a range.
No reliable range can be derived for this company. The reason is given below.
All values from audited annual reports filed with the US regulator SEC. No value is estimated, none smoothed.
| Grade | Points | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Balance sheet | 3/5 | Net debt to operating income 3.7× · Current ratio 2.1How this grade is builtNet debt to operating income3.7×2/51: ≤ 5.0×2: ≤ 4.0×3: ≤ 3.0×4: ≤ 2.0×5: ≤ 1.0×Next step: at most 3.0× for grade 3 Current ratio2.14/51: ≥ 0.82: ≥ 1.03: ≥ 1.34: ≥ 1.85: ≥ 2.5Next step: at least 2.5 for grade 5 Mean 2 + 4 / 2 = 3.00, rounded 3 |
| Profitability | 4/5 | Operating margin 29.8% · Return on equity not reportedHow this grade is builtOperating margin29.8%4/51: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 5.0%3: ≥ 12.0%4: ≥ 20.0%5: ≥ 30.0%Next step: at least 30.0% for grade 5 Return on equitynot reported—1: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 5.0%3: ≥ 10.0%4: ≥ 18.0%5: ≥ 25.0% Mean 4 / 1 = 4.00, rounded 4 |
| Cash flow | 4/5 | Free cash flow to revenue 19.2% · Profit covered by cash flow 1.2× · Free cash flow positive 5 of 5 yearsHow this grade is builtFree cash flow to revenue19.2%4/51: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 5.0%3: ≥ 10.0%4: ≥ 18.0%5: ≥ 25.0%Next step: at least 25.0% for grade 5 Profit covered by cash flow1.2×4/51: ≥ 0.4×2: ≥ 0.6×3: ≥ 0.8×4: ≥ 1.0×5: ≥ 1.2×Next step: at least 1.2× for grade 5 Free cash flow positive5 of 5 years5/51: 1 of 52: 2 of 53: 3 of 54: 4 of 55: 5 of 5 Mean 4 + 4 + 5 / 3 = 4.33, rounded 4 |
| Growth | 5/5 | Revenue growth per year 26.6% · Operating income per year 45.9%How this grade is builtRevenue growth per year26.6%5/51: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 3.0%3: ≥ 8.0%4: ≥ 15.0%5: ≥ 25.0% Operating income per year45.9%5/51: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 3.0%3: ≥ 8.0%4: ≥ 15.0%5: ≥ 25.0% Mean 5 + 5 / 2 = 5.00, rounded 5 |
Each grade is the rounded mean of two or three key figures, each placed on a five-step scale. Open the derivation under a grade to see, for every figure, the measured value, the step it reached and what the next step would have required.
No range is reported for this company. Not enough history.
Rank 2 of 3 in the industry. No median: only 3 companies in this industry have a grade; it is shown from five upwards. The grades are absolute and are not normalised to the sector: in a weak industry a weak grade stays weak.
The neighbours follow from the ranking alone, not from a judgement. More total points does not mean a company is the better investment, only that more quality rules are met. It says nothing about the price.
Every figure comes from the annual report of that year and has not been revised afterwards. Amounts in USD.
Swipe sideways for all columns.
| Year | Revenue | Operating profit | Free cash flow | Earnings per share | Shares | Net debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 330.54 m | 72.10 m | 62.17 m | — | — | 453.45 m |
| 2016 | 378.24 m | 115.66 m | 93.44 m | — | — | 668.79 m |
| 2017 | 429.94 m | 147.54 m | 93.30 m | — | — | 590.68 m |
| 2018 | 572.90 m | 184.04 m | 143.54 m | — | — | 882.70 m |
| 2019 | 688.80 m | 233.08 m | 146.42 m | — | — | 1.27 bn |
| 2020 | 406.62 m | 59.76 m | -21.42 m | — | — | 1.33 bn |
| 2021 | 587.02 m | 143.40 m | 135.22 m | — | — | 1.21 bn |
| 2022 | 936.77 m | 230.08 m | 140.15 m | — | — | 1.59 bn |
| 2023 | 1.07 bn | 272.86 m | 194.27 m | — | — | 1.63 bn |
| 2024 | 1.18 bn | 324.20 m | 188.81 m | — | — | 1.76 bn |
| 2025 | 1.32 bn | 394.68 m | 254.75 m | — | — | 2.03 bn |
4 of 8 points, measured over 10 years (2016 to 2025). Classification: present.
| Feature | Points | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Return on capital, level | 1/3 | The company earns on average 11.1% of its assets per year as operating profit, measured over 10 years. Comparable companies are around 10%. |
| Return on capital, consistency | 2/3 | 6 of 10 years above 10%. Consistency is the real evidence, because anyone has one good year. |
| Pricing power | —/2 | Gross profit is not reported separately in the filing. |
| Stability in a downturn | 1/2 | Operating margin averaging 29%. Tested in 2020 and 2022: 2020 15%, 2022 25%. Holding counts from two thirds of the company's own average. |
What is measured is the trace of a moat: a durably high return on capital and margins that survive a downturn. The causes (switching costs, network effects, brand, licences, economies of scale) appear in no filing and are not claimed here.
Expected on 5 Nov 2026 (estimated from the rhythm of earlier filings, ± 5 days). Grades can change after a report; the page is then rebuilt.
| Produced by | Florian Maier |
| Completed on | 14.10.2026 03:58 |
| Price as of | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Latest filing | 10-Q, 6 Aug 2026 |
| Method version | 2.7.0 |
| Time horizon | The grades describe a state that can change with every annual report, so roughly quarterly. The historical analysis is computed over 36 months. |
| Own position | Not disclosed individually, see the risk notice. |
| Earlier analyses | The list of all analyses of this company from the past twelve months will appear once twelve months of analyses exist. This run is the start of the series. |
This is not investment advice. Limits of the method, assumptions and conflicts of interest: risk notice.