How the number is built. Four grades for balance sheet, profitability, cash flow and growth, each from 0 to 5. More points is better, 20 is the maximum. The four grades are weighted equally and added; there is no weighting key and no markdown from the weakest grade. If a grade is missing because data is missing, it is not estimated: the total is then withheld and the page names what is missing. The share valuation does not enter the sum; it sits alongside as a range.
All values from audited annual reports filed with the US regulator SEC. No value is estimated, none smoothed.
| Grade | Points | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Balance sheet | 0/5 | Net debt to operating income 4.1× · Current ratio 0.7How this grade is builtNet debt to operating income4.1×0/51: ≤ 4.0×2: ≤ 3.0×3: ≤ 2.0×4: ≤ 1.0×5: ≤ 0.0×Next step: at most 4.0× for grade 1 Current ratio0.70/51: ≥ 0.82: ≥ 1.03: ≥ 1.34: ≥ 1.85: ≥ 2.5Next step: at least 0.8 for grade 1 Mean 0 + 0 / 2 = 0.00, rounded 0 |
| Profitability | 3/5 | Operating margin not reported · Return on equity 10.9%How this grade is builtOperating marginnot reported—1: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 5.0%3: ≥ 12.0%4: ≥ 20.0%5: ≥ 30.0% Return on equity10.9%3/51: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 5.0%3: ≥ 10.0%4: ≥ 18.0%5: ≥ 25.0%Next step: at least 18.0% for grade 4 Mean 3 / 1 = 3.00, rounded 3 |
| Cash flow | 1/5 | Free cash flow to revenue not reported · Profit covered by cash flow -0.8× · Free cash flow positive 2 of 5 yearsHow this grade is builtFree cash flow to revenuenot reported—1: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 5.0%3: ≥ 10.0%4: ≥ 18.0%5: ≥ 25.0% Profit covered by cash flow-0.8×0/51: ≥ 0.4×2: ≥ 0.6×3: ≥ 0.8×4: ≥ 1.0×5: ≥ 1.2×Next step: at least 0.4× for grade 1 Free cash flow positive2 of 5 years2/51: 1 of 52: 2 of 53: 3 of 54: 4 of 55: 5 of 5Next step: at least 3/5 for grade 3 Mean 0 + 2 / 2 = 1.00, rounded 1 |
| Growth | 2/5 | Revenue growth per year not reported · Operating income per year 5.1%How this grade is builtRevenue growth per yearnot reported—1: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 3.0%3: ≥ 8.0%4: ≥ 15.0%5: ≥ 25.0% Operating income per year5.1%2/51: ≥ 0.0%2: ≥ 3.0%3: ≥ 8.0%4: ≥ 15.0%5: ≥ 25.0%Next step: at least 8.0% for grade 3 Mean 2 / 1 = 2.00, rounded 2 |
Each grade is the rounded mean of two or three key figures, each placed on a five-step scale. Open the derivation under a grade to see, for every figure, the measured value, the step it reached and what the next step would have required.
The range comes from this company's own history, not from a comparison with others. Price today 15.82 EUR, range 25.27 to 27.52 EUR. The price sits below the lower edge of its own valuation range. The middle of the range sits 66.8% above today's price. Reliability: limited, from 2 methods.
| Method | Today | Series | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price to book value | 0,7 | 2008–2011 | 4 |
| Enterprise value to operating profit | 7,4 | 2008–2011 | 4 |
Open each method to see the arithmetic year by year.
| Year | Price | Basis | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 24,72 | 17,97 | 1,4 |
| 2009 | 24,72 | 20,04 | 1,2 |
| 2010 | 24,72 | 21,17 | 1,2 |
| 2011 | 24,72 | 22,90 | 1,1 |
| heute | 15,82 | 22,90 | 0,7 |
| Year | Price | Basis | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 24,72 | 1.653,00 | 9,4 |
| 2009 | 24,72 | 1.918,00 | 8,9 |
| 2010 | 24,72 | 1.864,00 | 9,7 |
| 2011 | 24,72 | 2.123,00 | 9,2 |
| heute | 15,82 | 2.123,00 | 7,4 |
Price divided by basis gives the multiple. Every row can be recomputed; if a row does not add up, this page is not built at all.
Rank 23 of 26 in the industry. Median of total points in this industry: 8.0 of 20, across 26 graded companies. The grades are absolute and are not normalised to the sector: in a weak industry a weak grade stays weak.
The neighbours follow from the ranking alone, not from a judgement. More total points does not mean a company is the better investment, only that more quality rules are met. It says nothing about the price.
Every figure comes from the annual report of that year and has not been revised afterwards. Amounts in USD.
Swipe sideways for all columns.
| Year | Revenue | Operating profit | Free cash flow | Earnings per share | Shares | Net debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | — | 1.74 bn | 687.00 m | — | — | -252.00 m |
| 2008 | — | 1.65 bn | -645.00 m | — | 434.89 m | 4.75 bn |
| 2009 | — | 1.92 bn | 1.07 bn | — | 434.89 m | 6.27 bn |
| 2010 | — | 1.86 bn | -394.00 m | — | 434.89 m | 7.37 bn |
| 2011 | — | 2.12 bn | -861.00 m | — | 434.89 m | 8.79 bn |
Expected on 27 Oct 2026 (estimated from the rhythm of earlier filings, ± 8 days). Grades can change after a report; the page is then rebuilt.
| Produced by | Florian Maier |
| Completed on | 14.10.2026 03:58 |
| Price as of | 12 Oct 2026 |
| Latest filing | 10-Q, 30 Jul 2026 |
| Method version | 2.7.0 |
| Time horizon | The grades describe a state that can change with every annual report, so roughly quarterly. The historical analysis is computed over 36 months. |
| Own position | Not disclosed individually, see the risk notice. |
| Earlier analyses | The list of all analyses of this company from the past twelve months will appear once twelve months of analyses exist. This run is the start of the series. |
This is not investment advice. Limits of the method, assumptions and conflicts of interest: risk notice.